<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: designer challenge: giambattista valli vs bakers</title>
	<link>http://theshoedish.com/2008/05/14/designer-challenge-giambattista-valli-vs-bakers/</link>
	<description>So pretty, you want to pet them</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: This Week in Shoes &#124; ShoeBlog</title>
		<link>http://theshoedish.com/2008/05/14/designer-challenge-giambattista-valli-vs-bakers/#comment-2068</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week in Shoes &#124; ShoeBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 20:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://theshoedish.com/2008/05/14/designer-challenge-giambattista-valli-vs-bakers/#comment-2068</guid>
		<description>[...] -We&#8217;ve had many inquiries on Giambattista Valli&#8217;s Victoria shoe. TheShoeDish has found the knock off version from Baker. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] -We&#8217;ve had many inquiries on Giambattista Valli&#8217;s Victoria shoe. TheShoeDish has found the knock off version from Baker. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nadarine</title>
		<link>http://theshoedish.com/2008/05/14/designer-challenge-giambattista-valli-vs-bakers/#comment-2020</link>
		<dc:creator>nadarine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 02:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://theshoedish.com/2008/05/14/designer-challenge-giambattista-valli-vs-bakers/#comment-2020</guid>
		<description>The cheapie is clearly on the right- the heel and platform are covered in something vinyl-esque, and the "fabric" on the toe is cheap pleather.  Sigh.  It's the difference between Louboutin fetish heels and fetish heels from the sketchy porn store.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cheapie is clearly on the right- the heel and platform are covered in something vinyl-esque, and the &#8220;fabric&#8221; on the toe is cheap pleather.  Sigh.  It&#8217;s the difference between Louboutin fetish heels and fetish heels from the sketchy porn store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaka</title>
		<link>http://theshoedish.com/2008/05/14/designer-challenge-giambattista-valli-vs-bakers/#comment-2014</link>
		<dc:creator>kaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://theshoedish.com/2008/05/14/designer-challenge-giambattista-valli-vs-bakers/#comment-2014</guid>
		<description>oh, little shoedish!  it's so clear that the beauty on the left is the real thing.  I think the Baker's shoe is cute, but in a shiny cheap way.  the softness of the expensive one shows even in this picture.

the baker's would cut the top of your foot!  how can i have sex wearing shoes which would cause blood to drip on the man between my verticaly extended legs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, little shoedish!  it&#8217;s so clear that the beauty on the left is the real thing.  I think the Baker&#8217;s shoe is cute, but in a shiny cheap way.  the softness of the expensive one shows even in this picture.</p>
<p>the baker&#8217;s would cut the top of your foot!  how can i have sex wearing shoes which would cause blood to drip on the man between my verticaly extended legs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
